Welcome to the first article in our series on ethics of generative AI for music, and how it affects PRODUCTS and PEOPLE! Here in PART 1, we will identify key stakeholders impacted by generative AI for music (PEOPLE), why each group might (or might not) want to engage with these tools, and why the 4Cs matter to music contributors.
Part 2 of our series on ethics of generative AI for music is now also out: https://sixpeas.substack.com/p/part-2-unfair-use-genai-music-ethics It covers how the 3 stakeholder groups in Part 1 are affected by ethical concerns (including model biases), the “pro-choice” view of ownership rights, and the importance of "informed consent".
Part 3 is up next, on the who, what & when of the current genAI music tools. While we’re working on finalizing Part 3 and beyond, we’d love to hear from musicians, music lovers & consumers, technical folks, and people who are two or more of those! What do you think? Did we miss any important concerns that matter to you, or do you have a different view on some points?
This blog post provides a great explanation of IP rights of composers, performers, and production companies (our WHO): https://blog.bandlab.com/music-rights-insights-and-implications/
Part 2 of our series on ethics of generative AI for music is now also out: https://sixpeas.substack.com/p/part-2-unfair-use-genai-music-ethics It covers how the 3 stakeholder groups in Part 1 are affected by ethical concerns (including model biases), the “pro-choice” view of ownership rights, and the importance of "informed consent".
Part 3 is up next, on the who, what & when of the current genAI music tools. While we’re working on finalizing Part 3 and beyond, we’d love to hear from musicians, music lovers & consumers, technical folks, and people who are two or more of those! What do you think? Did we miss any important concerns that matter to you, or do you have a different view on some points?